How Katz will effect your retirement plans

Published Sep 2, 1998

Share

Personal Finance Editor, Bruce Cameron and columnist, Magnus Heystek, who is deputy chairman of the Citadel financial services group were the main speakers at a Syfrets Private Bank/Saturday Argus Investors Club meeting. Heystek and Cameron, who are the joint authors of Retirement - The Amazing and Scary Truth, spoke about the enormous complexity of retirement for everyone. This is an extract from Cameron's speech.

The main principles of the Michael Katz recommendations on the taxation of retirement

funds are based on all funds being taxed in the same way and that retirement funding

should not be given any tax advantages over any other type of savings.

Bruce Cameron says the main argument used by Katz to justify his recommendations was

that people are using one type of investment as opposed to another to gain a tax

advantage, otherwise known as tax arbitrage.

KATZ ON PRE-RETIREMENT

Deferred tax on retirement fund contributions

If you are employed:

* Contributions up to 7,5 percent of your pensionable income are tax deductible;

* Employers are entitled to claim an amount equal to a maximum of 15 percent of an

employee's pensionable income.

If you are self-employed:

* Contributions of up to 22,5 percent of your taxable income are tax deductible

Tax on the build up of retirement funds.

Katz recommended that interest, rental and any trading income earned by the capital in

a retirement fund should be taxed at a flat rate of up to 30 percent.

In the 1996/97 budget the government accepted the principle but at a lower 17 percent.

This was pushed up to 25 percent in the 1998/99 budget making a real impact on the

final benefits. This tax does not apply after retirement.

KATZ ON RETIREMENT

He has recommended that all your retirement benefits should be lumped together and the

full amount taxed.

He says that tax incentives should be given to encourage you to buy a monthly pension

(annuity) with some of your accumulated retirement funds.

The incentives Katz recommended are:

All retirement benefits should be treated as a lump sum and the first R50 000 should be

tax free.

Of the lump sum used to purchase a monthly pension:

* First R120 000 tax free; and

* A further 50 percent should be tax free up to a maximum of R210 000.

A lump sum of R540 000 provides the maximum tax free amount of R380 000).

The remainder of the lump sum is taxed on a sliding scale with marginal rates moving up

to a maximum of 45 percent, which is reached at R750 000 after the deduction of the R380

000 tax-free amount.

EXAMPLE OF THE KATZ EFFECT

Capital Sum:

R1 500 000

Tax Free:

R380 000

Taxable Amount:

R1 120 000

Tax on the first

R750 000:

R202 500

Balance at 45

percent:

R166 500

Tax payable:

R369 000

Funds available for

investment:

R591 000

Plus annuity:

R540 000

Total:

R1 131 000

An investment of R540 000, giving you the maximum R380 000 tax benefit, would buy you a

monthly pension of about R5 300 if you are a man aged 60. Women would get less because

they live longer.

HOW KATZ TAKES MORE OUT OF YOUR RETIREMENT POCKET

For simplicity's sake say you had R1,5 million in retirement capital on the day you

retired.

On the Katz recommendations in the above example you would pay tax of R369 000.

Currently on a defined contribution pension fund you would pay:

Capital Sum:

R1 500 000

Less two thirds

compulsory pension:

R1 million

Lump sum

R500 000

Less tax free

portion

R120 000

Taxable portion

R380 000

Tax payable at

average

rate of 25 percent

R95 000

So the difference between now and Katz tax system would be:

Tax payable under

Katz:

R369 000

Under the current

system

R95 000

Extra tax under Katz

R274 000

This is an additional 18,2 percent of your retirement capital that you will lose under

the Katz recommendations.

KATZ AFTER RETIREMENT

Katz made no recommendations. You would pay tax as you do now.

Related Topics: