Transnet mass resignations: railway must be under stewardship of railway community

Two men walking along the railway track towards Nyanga Junction, Cape Town. Picture Henk Kruger Cape Argus

Two men walking along the railway track towards Nyanga Junction, Cape Town. Picture Henk Kruger Cape Argus

Published Oct 5, 2023

Share

By Bongani Mankewu

In October 2009, the newly elected socialist government of Greece under George A Papandreou revealed a budget deficit of 12.7% of gross domestic product for 2009, more than double what the departing government had stated and four times the initial predictions.

Greek debt held by foreign banks amounted to $430 billion (roughly R8.3 trillion), which led to a battle between Greece and the global bond market. Based on the disclosure, the rating agencies cut the government’s debt rating, led by Moody’s, citing the “crumbling finances”. The Greek parliament responded by passing an “austerity budget”, slashing public spending by 10%.

Eurozone members were speculating that Greece may leave due to the crisis. Investors were “worried that the Greek crisis could trigger a domino effect across southern Europe”, but the International Monetary Fund (IMF) was not viewed as a feasible option for a rescue at the time of this crisis. They were aware of the dangers posed by the IMF’s intervention in Greece and how doing so might eventually undermine its hegemony.

South Africa’s current financial situation is characterised by liabilities to the IMF and World Bank, a greylisting, and other debts. In both logistics, which has a detrimental effect on exports, and energy, which is similar to the economic and social death knell, these state-owned enterprises (SOEs) play a significant role in the economy and society.

Despite identifying every aspect that affects our SOEs, we are unsure whether we should import governance which has no credit borrowing requirements but is the root cause of the problem.

Economic growth in South Africa is anticipated to support inclusive growth, with SOEs working in tandem with development finance institutions (DFIs) as the engine. Since it is obvious how SOEs are deteriorating, it has become more obvious how gains and losses are distributed unevenly during this economic crisis.

The government continues to fob off the economic and energy crisis including logistics harnessed by governance failures and browbeaten ministries. This is the test of how long people on the periphery can bear these deluded tricks that force them to march over cliffs like lemmings.

Most of our exports come from raw materials. Since the turn of the millennium, low-cost electricity and effective rail freight networks have increased SA Revenue Service’s primary sources of revenue.

Unfortunately, the former key foundations of our economy, such as getting reliable energy from Eskom, effective logistics from Transnet are caught up in avaricious gluttony that is woven into the fabric of the debt trap at both the governmental and household levels. This leads to debt peonage as a result, and the economic necrosis demands sincere contemplation that should compile experiences and assess their relative value. This reflection must also express the new attitude of will in the face of the crisis so that it may be comprehended more clearly and put to use for a specific goal.

SOEs and DFIs cannot be used as political toys. They are the first instruments to be recognised to get out of this bleary economic situation through revived effective and efficient governance.

According to Khan et al. (2019), the word “governance” derives from the Greek verb “Kubernao”, which means “to control”. It is a demonstration of having the authority, plausibility, and responsibility to oversee or co-ordinate corporate plans, management, and operations at the highest level.

Clear institutional frameworks, transparent shareholder agreements, transparent lines of accountability, thoughtful financial models, and sustainability assurance are necessary to address such issues. Instead of dismantling the Public Enterprises Ministry, the Shareholder Compacts and, in the case of Transnet, the National Rail Policy, which includes the Public Finance Management Act, need to be carefully examined and cognisant of external knowledge from the industry.

A body made up of business and government should be established to ensure that SOE shareholder agreements are in line with their dual objectives of being financially viable and developmental to promote job creation and inclusive economic growth, cascading to the National Development Plan.

The many resignations at Transnet and the financial harm already caused by profligacy are the results of the planned “no co-ordination” of power, plausibility, and accountability. This increases ravenous thievery. Since progress is compared to an ideal that reflection creates, railways must be allowed to be managed by railway people.

South Africa is awash with railway expertise, in all spheres of the sector from working the tracks to climbing the stepladders to the electrical traction lines, to signalling, general logistics of “pit-to-port” reaching the arteries of global trade, and right up to scholarship in areas of finance and engineering enhanced by industry experience.

We must be mindful that our nation has plenty of railway experience as we ponder how to get out of the economic morass we’re in.

Some of us know this railway, its arcades, and its community more than we know ourselves and our families.

Bongani Mankewu is the director of the Infrastructure Finance Advisory Institute.

BUSINESS REPORT